PixelsWithin

Client case study

Unicode Consortium

A 1990s-era website holding an enormous body of technical information became clearer and more usable for the global audiences who depend on Unicode.

Unicode reported a jump in traffic and several new sponsorships after the redesign.

Role
Information architect, product designer, and frontend developer
Project type
Global nonprofit website
Redesigned Unicode Consortium homepage with navigation, character grid, and mission

Situation and responsibility

What was at stake

Unicode's standards make digital communication possible, but its aging website had to serve specialists, implementers, sponsors, and members of the public through a vast technical information structure.

The existing 1990s-era experience was especially difficult on phones. The redesign needed to improve general-public engagement without flattening the material experts depended on.

Client
Unicode Consortium
Audience
Technical specialists, implementers, sponsors, and the public
Focus
Information architecture, responsive UX, and frontend
Responsibility
Structure, product thinking, visual design, and implementation

Diana’s responsibility

  • Restructured a large technical information space
  • Designed navigation for audiences with different levels of context
  • Created a clearer responsive visual system
  • Developed the public-facing frontend

Important decisions

Judgment made visible

Each response follows from an observed condition. The last column marks the tempting shortcut the work needed to avoid.

What you noticeWhat it may meanA useful responseWhat to resist
Many audiences entered with different questions.One undifferentiated hierarchy could not serve them all.Create clearer paths by intent while preserving deep technical access.Do not simplify by removing expert material.
Phone users faced a desktop-era site.Responsive behavior had to reshape the hierarchy.Design the primary journeys around smaller screens as well as desktop.Do not treat mobile as a compressed afterthought.

Decisions and delivery

How the work moved

  1. 01

    Map the audiences

    Separate public orientation, organizational information, and specialist reference needs.

  2. 02

    Rebuild the hierarchy

    Create navigation and page structures that reveal depth in useful stages.

  3. 03

    Design and deliver

    Carry the system through responsive visual design and frontend implementation.

Working through a similar constraint?

Describe the problem →

Supported outcomes

What the evidence supports

Quantitative claims appear only where the repository provides them. The remaining outcomes are explicitly qualitative, operational, or statements of responsibility.

01Client-reported result

Traffic increased

The client reported a jump in traffic after the redesign.

02Client-reported result

New sponsorships

The client also reported several new sponsorships.

03Information architecture

Complexity preserved

Technical depth remained available inside a clearer public experience.

Bring me the version that is hard to explain.

If your website has to welcome the public without frustrating experts, show me where those paths collide.

Describe a similar problem →