PixelsWithin

Selected product work

1nHealth

Small delays inside a healthcare recruitment platform multiplied across the team’s day. Redesigning the interface and implementation made two frequent workflows markedly faster.

A common task fell from four clicks to one; a key lookup fell from about five seconds to half a second.

Role
Product design and engineering contributor
Project type
Healthcare recruitment platform
1nHealth patient recruitment funnel dashboard with campaign stages and metrics

Situation and responsibility

What was at stake

Internal teams used the platform repeatedly throughout the day to recruit and communicate with participants.

A common messaging action took four clicks, while an important lookup took roughly five seconds. Each delay was small in isolation but expensive at workflow frequency.

Client
1nHealth
Users
Internal recruitment teams
Focus
High-frequency workflows
Responsibility
Interface and implementation improvements

Diana’s responsibility

  • Observed friction in repeated staff tasks
  • Reduced steps in the messaging workflow
  • Improved the implementation behind a slow lookup
  • Treated performance and interaction design as one problem

Important decisions

Judgment made visible

Each response follows from an observed condition. The last column marks the tempting shortcut the work needed to avoid.

What you noticeWhat it may meanA useful responseWhat to resist
Messaging required four clicks.Routine work was carrying avoidable interaction cost.Put the frequent action directly in reach.Do not optimize rare edge cases first.
A key lookup took about five seconds.Interface polish could not hide implementation delay.Redesign the visible workflow and the underlying query together.Do not treat speed as a separate engineering concern.

Decisions and delivery

How the work moved

  1. 01

    Find repeated friction

    Focus on tasks whose cost compounded across each staff member's day.

  2. 02

    Shorten the path

    Remove intermediate actions and improve the lookup behind the interface.

  3. 03

    Measure the difference

    Compare click count and response time on the same routine workflows.

Working through a similar constraint?

Describe the problem →

Supported outcomes

What the evidence supports

Quantitative claims appear only where the repository provides them. The remaining outcomes are explicitly qualitative, operational, or statements of responsibility.

01Measured workflow

Four clicks to one

The common messaging task became directly accessible.

02Measured performance

About 5s to 0.5s

A key lookup became roughly ten times faster.

03Operational effect

Less daily friction

The benefit repeated every time internal staff used these tools.

Bring me the version that is hard to explain.

If seconds and clicks are accumulating across your team’s day, show me the workflow.

Describe a similar problem →